standing fast for liberty. Gal. 5:1
For help and support, call us at (334) 239-8987 or click here to email us.

Words from the Rising Republics

Dig or Beg, Chapter One

 

Present day Alabama. Forces of the present day use the same methods used over eleven hundred years ago by Jezebel and Ahab. The object was to take Naboth’s property located near the King’s summer palace in Jezreel. Bearing false witness achieved the goal that ended in the stoning of Naboth. Today, theft uses unsworn and unverified statements of barred attorneys accepted, not as false, but true. So effective is the method that murder is rarely is murder necessary. See 1 Kings 21 & 2 Kings 9. Sometimes when digging to please the King fails, begging is all that remains, and, without mercy, death is certain.

CHAPTER ONE: FOURTEEN YEARS, AGO A DIFFERENCE IN INTENTIONS

Maxim: A hidden intention is bad. My intent gives a name to my act.

The “borrowers”, Haywood Jackson and Alice Faye Mizell wished to make a mortgage loan so that they would be able to purchase a piece of real “historical” property that would be preserved as restored and made their home. The mortgage closing date with Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. was June 9, 2003.

MORTGAGE STANDARD: NOTE EVIDENCES THE DEBT

 A “lender” who makes a mortgage loan must have the promissory note that evidences the debt placed in a secure locked, fireproof container. (See EXHIBIT CFR-R 34 CFR 674.19(4)-Fiscal procedures and records) Once paid in full the mortgage loan promissory note instrument must be returned to the borrower stamped paid in full. (See Ala. Code 7-3-501(b) (2) and 7 CFR 1951) The original promissory note secured by mortgage must have the mortgage of the real property placed on file at the recorder of deeds and mortgages at the courthouse in the county where the real property is located. (See Ala. Code § 35-4-51.) Please note that Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. ceased its corporate existence in the spring of 2004, months before Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. was approved to do business in Alabama. Obviously, the assignment, “without recourse”, signed by an official of WFHM, Inc, transferring the unit from Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. to Client 708, FHLMC was before Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. became a servicer qualified to do business in Alabama. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. never owned the promissory note, the evidence of debt, acting solely as Servicer.

Should the “lender” elect to sell the promissory note, the assignment must be duly executed, and the assignment placed on file in the same courthouse. Every assignment must be recorded. The chain of title must remain unbroken. (See Ala. Uniform Securities Act Page 46, Paragraph 11(a)) The purpose of the recording is to give notice to the world of the ownership of the property and who might have interest in the property, the holder-in-due-course of a debt instrument.

Only the holder-in-due-course with the properly assigned note duly recorded can liquidate the mortgage identified as the real property to be used to satisfy the note which is the evidence of debt. (See §7-3-305 Defenses and Claims in Recoupment). In every mortgage loan when the note, which evidences the debt, is paid in full, then the note must be stamped paid-in-full and returned promptly to the borrower. (See §7-3-501(b)(2)). When the borrower holds the note then the note has been satisfied and taken out of circulation.

In a mortgage loan when a borrower default occurs, consent is given in the mortgage itself and that consent is called “power of sale” in that the property may be liquidated to satisfy the note which is the evidence of debt.

Prepayment of the mortgage loan note satisfies the loan taking the loan out of circulation by stamping the note “paid in full” and returning the note to the signers of the instrument note. The mortgage is thereby extinguished. Should the “lender” improperly refuse prepayment in full, (See American Jurisprudence §618) then the lender has defaulted and must pay treble damages as an operation of law, if a wrongful foreclosure has been conducted.

 

(See § 55-59.6. Foreclosure; civil penalty for fraud; civil action

C. The owner of the property subject to foreclosure has a civil cause action against a person who has violated this section, and shall be entitled to recover from such person compensatory damages in the amount of three times the damages incurred by the owner as a result of the violation in addition to reasonable attorney fees and costs.)

 It is important to note that in a mortgage foreclosure based on a borrower’s default in payment, legal notice of the time and date of the foreclosure auction conducted with “power of sale” must be published in a local newspaper for three consecutive weeks (four successive weeks where there is no “power of sale”) or the sale is not valid.

When a creditor defaults by improperly refusing prepayment in full, the re-conveyance requires no legal notice publication. See American Jurisprudence § 618.  

UNSECURED CHECK WHEN SEPARATED FROMTHE MORTGAGE

The “lender” Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. wished to purchase a promissory note for resale, but wished to mislead the borrowers into thinking that they have received a mortgage loan with the real property to be purchased to become security for the mortgage loan if the borrower defaults.

Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc., the “lender”, before the transfer to Freddie Mac, the actual lender, wishes to keep its dealings with the promissory note a secret, the usual legal term is fraudulent concealment. Why? Once the promissory note is executed and delivered to Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc. it can be made into an electronic file after it has been scanned and then, to avoid duplication, the original can be shredded. The promissory note in electronic form can be delivered to Freddie Mac who came forward with funds to purchase the promissory note. Freddie Mac’s procedural manual required physical delivery of the note and mortgage complete with the original signor signatures.  The promissory note sold to Freddie Mac is stamped “WITHOUT RECOURSE PAY TO THE ORDER OF________________” and signed by the (now defunct since 2004) corporate official. The promissory note has been changed into a check separated from the mortgage and distributed into commercial trade. No mortgage loan has ever been made, which establishes that the instruments filed into public record is false.

Please note that to collect on a check which has no attached “power of sale” for specific property must publish four successive weeks of legal notice in a local newspaper. See Ala. Code § 35-10-3 since the instant case foreclosure was for a check, the publishing for three actual weeks was insufficient making the foreclosure deed false. The publication should have been for four successive weeks. What bank was the check drawn on?

Again, when the “lender” defaults by refusing prepayment in full, re-conveyance is made without publishing notice.

Since the borrowers were made to believe that they were making a mortgage loan, they were not asked for consent that the promissory note be transformed into a check for distribution into commercial trade. Therefore, the check is circulated without consent. A false instrument is a “document”, a photocopy bearing no wet-ink signature granting consent.

How the determination is made as to the “lender's” treatment of the promissory note is simple. Once sold a promissory note is not required to be returned to the borrower after the promissory note has been made into a check and put into commercial trade. A promissory note secured by a mortgage must be returned to the borrower if full payment is made. The return of the promissory note defines its being a check or a mortgage.

Central to the understanding of this conflict of intentions between the “borrower” and the “lender” is knowing that the signature on a piece of paper is the property of the signer and is of great value. The signature on a piece of paper constituting a promissory note, the instrument, which becomes tangible property and cannot be destroyed by anyone other than the signer. The signer can destroy the note once it has been paid in full. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. destroyed the note after it was scanned and transferred to Freddie Mac, identified as the lender, and before the false instrument, paraded as a mortgage, was filed in the courthouse records. No subsequent assignments are on record as checks require no recordation. Having been separated from the mortgage with no recorded assignment, the note is null and void making the mortgage unenforceable.

§ 7-3-305c implies that FHLMC having bought a check that is separated from the mortgage (a mortgage must be assigned and recorded), is without rights of a holder-in-due-course connected with a mortgage. Separation of the note and mortgage renders the note and mortgage null and void. Only the one entitled to the money secured is entitled to foreclose or the proven ownership of the debt. The holder in due course by assignment or the holder or bearer of the note at the time of foreclosure begins can foreclose. Ownership of the mortgage does not pass though indorsed in blank. Property cannot be transferred when the foreclosure deed is invalid because of lack of authority to foreclose.  The assignment by an agent to a mortgage cannot be valid other than by possession from delivery of the instrument which consents to “power of sale”.

The attorney for Wells Fargo, Stephen Pudner, stated in the hearing in February 2014 Federal Court that the instruments were a mortgage and that the Appellant had defaulted, but Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. would not surrender the instrument even though full payment had been made because no original can be disbursed. The unit had been destroyed as no longer needed. Many copies are available. Mr. Pudner stated that Wells Fargo sympathized with the Mr. Mizell in the unfortunate circumstances especially seeing that the Mr. Mizell had been swayed by James B. Graham, who signed an affidavit to refinance and showed that the source of funds on deposit with Wells Fargo, deposits to be used in full payment and satisfaction of the mortgage. Wells Fargo refused the verified prepayment offer and foreclosed to cover the obvious fraud.

The attorney, D. Keith Andress, for Wells Fargo stated in the state court December 2014 hearing that the instrument was a check and was the property of Wells Fargo. WF does not surrender original documents, but would give the Appellant a photocopy. No instrument was offered, only a false instrument. No mention was made of the true lender, FHLMC as reported to the IRS on a form 1099A.

Mizell gave written authorization to WFHM for Mr. Mizell to speak as representative for he and his wife. Mr. Andress had no authority to speak for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. No one was present to speak for Wells Fargo. The court instead permitted an unsworn and unverified statement from Mr. Andress that was as competent evidence. The Judge does not have a performance bond as required by law. The judge has a filed payment bond of record. The law prohibits anyone from holding a public office who has no filed performance bond. All actions by an unbonded judge are void even his recognition of incompetent evidence.

Mr. Andress filed an appearance, but will not file written authorization from the Wells Fargo’s Board of Directors. Wells Fargo has no barred attorney representation in this case. By law, hearsay cannot be accepted as competent evidence.

Who is the true lender? Let the True-lender’s Counsel speak.

Who does Wells Fargo perform servicer duties for? Mr. Andress could show no Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Who and where is the “party-of-interest” whose identity can be proven?

Why was there no face to face meeting before foreclosure as required by law? A face to face is not required for collection of a check. Wells Fargo knew it was a check, but conducted a “power of sale” auction without four weeks of sufficient notice making the entire foreclosure wrongful and subject to treble damages as required by HUD.

Wells Fargo filed, on an IRS 1099A form, that the true lender was Freddie Mac. Wells Fargo had sold its interest to Freddie Mac, but had failed to record the assignment of the transfer on public record. Wells Fargo used the separated mortgage on file with the Dale County Probate Office as authority to foreclose claiming the check as a valid loan and lien. Publication was made for three consecutive weeks wanting all to believe that the false instruments were a mortgage loan, not a check. The law prohibits foreclosure auction conducted before thirty days after the last legal published notice. Theft depends on an evasion of legal conduct.

No mention was made of Wells Fargo’s improper refusal of prepayment. After all, Wells Fargo stated that they only foreclosed on those who did not deserve to remain in their homes implying that only a borrower can default, never a lender.

Law enforcement was illegally presence at the non-judicial foreclosure auction of Mizell’s property.

So, denial of trial by jury has kept secret the recognition of the true lender, the true holder-in-due-course, and the determination of the validity after the separation of the note from the mortgage, or if the “tail” is dead. The cow is recognized as the note, and the mortgage as the tail. The cow can live without the tail, but the tail cannot live without the tail.

These are few issues in controversy. Creditor default is defined as improperly refusing payment. Slander of Title and default Judgment are other examples of lender default.

The FBI has stated that 80% of all mortgage fraud is conducted by the lender, not the borrower. The public holds that the opposite is true. So sad. The national asset ownership in the hands of the one-percent has grown from 9% in 1999 to 48% in 2017. One must admit that the method Jezebel used in 900 B.C. is just as effective when used in 2017.

LEGAL PLUNDER AND JUSTICE

 

Frederic Bastiat in 1850 made this observation in The Law.

“the purpose of the law is to prevent injustice from reigning.”

       “When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it

and a moral code that glorifies it.”

       Mr. Potter, Vanity Fair Magazine “It can fairly be said that the chain of catastrophic bets made over the past decade by a few hundred bankers

may well turn out to be the greatest non-violent crime against humanity in history”

Frederic Bastiat in 1850:

“When a portion of wealth passes out of the hands of him who has acquired it, without his consent, and without compensation, to him who has not created it, whether by force or by artifice, I say that property is violated, that plunder is perpetrated. I say that this is exactly what the law ought to repress always and everywhere. If the law itself performs the action it ought to repress, I say that plunder is still perpetrated, and even, in a social point of view, under aggravated circumstances. In this case however, he who profits from the plunder is not responsible for it; it is the lawgiver, society itself, and this is where the political danger lies. I declare that I do not mean to impugn the intentions nor the morality of anybody. I am attacking an idea that I believe to be false-a system that appears to me to be unjust; and this is so independent of intentions, that each of us profits by it without wishing it, and suffers from it without being aware of the cause.”  

VICTIMS OF LAWFUL PLUNDER

Men naturally rebel against the injustice of which they are victims. Thus, when plunder is organized by law for the profit of those who make the law, all the plundered classes try somehow to enter — by peaceful or revolutionary means — into the making of laws. According to their degree of enlightenment, these plundered classes may propose one of two entirely different purposes when they attempt to attain political power: Either they may wish to stop lawful plunder, or they may wish to share in it.

Woe to the nation when this latter purpose prevails among the mass victims of lawful plunder when they, in turn, seize the power to make laws! Until that happens, the few practice lawful plunder upon the many, a common practice where the right to participate in the making of law is limited to a few persons. But then, participation in the making of law becomes universal. And then, men seek to balance their conflicting interests by universal plunder. Instead of rooting out the injustices found in society, they make these injustices general. As soon as the plundered classes gain political power, they establish a system of reprisals against other classes. They do not abolish legal plunder. (This objective would demand more enlightenment than they possess.) Instead, they emulate their evil predecessors by participating in this legal plunder, even though it is against their own interests.

It is as if it were necessary, before a reign of justice appears, for everyone to suffer a cruel retribution — some for their evilness, and some for their lack of understanding.

THE RESULTS OF LEGAL PLUNDER

It is impossible to introduce into society a greater change and a greater evil than this: the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder.

What are the consequences of such a perversion? It would require volumes to describe them all. Thus, we must content ourselves with pointing out the most striking.

In the first place, it erases from everyone's conscience the distinction between justice and injustice.

No society can exist unless the laws are respected to a certain degree. The safest way to make laws respected is to make them respectable. When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law. These two evils are of equal consequence, and it would be difficult for a person to choose between them.

The nature of law is to maintain justice. This is so much the case that, in the minds of the people, law and justice are one and the same thing. There is in all of us a strong disposition to believe that anything lawful is also legitimate. This belief is so widespread that many persons have erroneously held that things are "just" because law makes them so. Thus, in order to make plunder appear just and sacred to many consciences, it is only necessary for the law to decree and sanction it. Slavery, restrictions, and monopoly find defenders not only among those who profit from them but also among those who suffer from them.

PROPERTY AND PLUNDER

Man can live and satisfy his wants only by ceaseless labor; by the ceaseless application of his faculties to natural resources. This process is the origin of property.

But it is also true that a man may live and satisfy his wants by seizing and consuming the products of the labor of others. This process is the origin of plunder.

Now since man is naturally inclined to avoid pain — and since labor is pain in itself — it follows that men will resort to plunder whenever plunder is easier than work. History shows this quite clearly. And under these conditions, neither religion nor morality can stop it.

When, then, does plunder stop? It stops when it becomes more painful and more dangerous than labor.

It is evident, then, that the proper purpose of law is to use the power of its collective force to stop this fatal tendency to plunder instead of to work. All the measures of the law should protect property and punish plunder.

But, generally, the law is made by one man or one class of men. And since law cannot operate without the sanction and support of a dominating force, this force must be entrusted to those who make the laws.

This fact, combined with the fatal tendency that exists in the heart of man to satisfy his wants with the least possible effort, explains the almost universal perversion of the law. Thus, it is easy to understand how law, instead of checking injustice, becomes the invincible weapon of injustice. It is easy to understand why the law is used by the legislator to destroy in varying degrees among the rest of the people, their personal independence by slavery, their liberty by oppression, and their property by plunder. This is done for the benefit of the person who makes the law, and in proportion to the power that he holds.

THE RESULTS OF LEGAL PLUNDER

It is impossible to introduce into society a greater change and a greater evil than this: the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder.

What are the consequences of such a perversion? It would require volumes to describe them all. Thus, we must content ourselves with pointing out the most striking.

In the first place, it erases from everyone's conscience the distinction between justice and injustice.

No society can exist unless the laws are respected to a certain degree. The safest way to make laws respected is to make them respectable. When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law. These two evils are of equal consequence, and it would be difficult for a person to choose between them.

The nature of law is to maintain justice. This is so much the case that, in the minds of the people, law and justice are one and the same thing. There is in all of us a strong disposition to believe that anything lawful is also legitimate. This belief is so widespread that many persons have erroneously held that things are "just" because law makes them so. Thus, in order to make plunder appear just and sacred to many consciences, it is only necessary for the law to decree and sanction it. Slavery, restrictions, and monopoly find defenders not only among those who profit from them but also among those who suffer from them.

Sexual Harassment

 

Harvey Weinstein is an American film producer and former film studio executive accused of sexual harassment. He and his brother Bob Weinstein co-founded Miramax, which produced several popular independent films.

The first thing that comes to mind, “Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.”

Obviously, were he a believer, he could bear in mind that if believers are dead to the law, believers are dead to this present evil world also, and linked with a risen, ascended and glorified Christ, Hence, believers of death, burial, and resurrection are not of the world, even as Christ is not of the world. A believer should not contend for position in the world to do so is to deny that believers are dead to the law; for a believer cannot be alive to the one and dead to the other. The death of Christ has delivered as from the law, from the power of sin, from this present evil world, and from the fear of death. But then all these things hang together, and a believer cannot go delivered from one without being delivered from all. To assert our freedom from the law, while pursuing a course of carnality, self-indulgence and worldliness, is one of the darkest and deadliest evils of the last days.

The believer is called to prove, in his daily life, that grace can produce results that law could never reach. It is one of the moral glories of Christianity to enable a man to surrender self and live for others. Law never could do this. It occupied a man with himself. Under the rule of law, every man had to do the best he could for himself. If he tried to love his neighbor, it was to work out a righteousness for himself. Under grace, all is blessedly and gloriously reversed. Self is set aside as a thing crucified, dead and buried. The old "I" is gone, and the new "I" is before God in all the acceptability and preciousness of Christ. He is our life, our righteousness, our holiness, our object, our model, our all. He is in us as believers and are in Him; and our daily practical life is to be simply Christ reproduced in us, by the power of the Holy Ghost. Hence, we believers are not only called to love our neighbor, but our enemy; and this, not to work out a righteousness, for we have become the righteousness of God in Christ; it is simply the outflow of the life which we possess, which is in us; and this life is Christ. A believer is a man who should live Christ. He is neither a Jew, "under law;" nor a Gentile "without law;" but "a man in Christ," standing in grace, called to the same character of obedience as that which was rendered by the Lord Jesus Himself.

DEFAULT BY LENDER AND DEFAULT BY BORROWER

 

Private Mortgage Agreement Default

No State or Federal law can impair the obligations of the parties to the agreement.

 

Borrower default:

  1. 1.Failure to pay as agreed.
  2. 2.Omission of maintenance
  3. 3.Lapse in insurance coverage
  4. 4.Deficient in tax obligations

Lender default:

  1. 1.Failure to file on public record the mortgage or its assignment.
  2. 2.Separation of promissory note and mortgage that must remain one unit
  3. 3.Refuse equitable right of prepayment
  4. 4.It is against equity to deprive freeman of the free disposal of their own property.
  5. 5.Law enforcement personnel cannot be present at auction in a non-judicial state.

Judicial aid is limited to enforcement of the agreement. No attorney is needed.

The agreement is private with no need of public involvement.

The FBI has determined that 80% of all mortgage fraud is done by the lender not the borrower.

FRAUD EXAMPLES

  1. 1.Original are scanned and made into an electronic copy to avoid transfer assignments at the courthouse.
  2. 2.Instruments are shredded so that millions of copies can be made when desired.
  3. 3.Accounting control fraud permits mortgages to be accounted as assets on the Investment Banking Books as non-performing.
  4. 4.Claiming title to property by declaring the property to be abandoned after foreclosure
  5. 5.Refusing to surrender the instrument if full payment is made.
  6. 6.Foreclosing without rights of the holder-in-due-course.

Why?

Unsworn and unverified statements by Barred Attorneys are unlawfully considered competent evidence in both Judicial and Non-Judicial courts.

It is politically correct to classify all default to be by the borrower.

Federal courts have no jurisdiction over property inside a state unless due process rights are denied. Courts proclaim judgments with subject matter jurisdiction in both State and Federal courts.

Equal justice of the law is ignored for the borrower.

Moreover, in the case of original mortgages and promissory notes, they are not merely exhibits but instruments which must be surrendered prior to the issuance of a judgment. The judgment takes the place of the promissory note. Surrendering the note is essential so that it cannot thereafter be negotiated.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT (NO BOND: NO ACCOUNTABILITY)

 

       In the United States the People are sovereign and the government cannot   sever its relationship to the People by taking away their citizenship. Afroyim v Rusk, 387 U.S. 253 (1967).

        Officers of the Court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from liability, for they are deemed to know the law. Owen v Independence, 100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 62

      The 14th Amendment, Section 3, of the Constitution of the United States says, having previously taken an oath… as an officer of the United States or as an executive or judicial officer of the states, to support the Constitution of the United States. No person shall… hold any office, civil or military, under the united States who, States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or give aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.

       Title USC SECTION 4 Mis-prison of Felony: Who ever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the united States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the united States, shall be fined under this Title or imprisoned not more than three years or both.        

         Rulings and orders done without jurisdiction, either subject matter or personal jurisdiction must be set aside are void (ab initio). Jaffe and Asher v Van Brunt, S.D.N.Y.1994. 158 F.R.D. 278.

        A State Constitutional provision prohibiting Courts from passing on Constitutional questions takes from the accused the right of interposing the defense the act under which he is prosecuted is unconstitutional, and is invalid as violating the Due Process of Law clause. People v Max, 70 Colo. 100, 198 P. 150 (1921)

          Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a requirement, only the appearance of partiality. (liljeberg v Health Service Acquisition Corp, 486 U.S. 847, 108 s. Ct. 2194 (1988) ( what matters is not the reality of bias or prejudice but its appearance);

          Officers of the Court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from liability, for they are deemed, to know the law. Owen v Independence, 100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 622:

         The State constitutional provision prohibiting Courts from passing on Constitutional questions takes from the accused the right of interposing the defense the act under which he is prosecuted is unconstitutional, and is invalid as violating the Due Process of Law clause. (People v Max, 70 Colo. 100, 198 P. 150 (1921).

          “ Sovereign immunity does not apply where (as here) government is a lawbreaker or jurisdiction is the issue.” Arthur v Fry, 300 F. Supp, 622 (1960).

        Knowing failure to disclose material information necessary to prevent statement from being misleading, or making representation despite knowledge that it has no reasonable basis in fact, are actionable as fraud under law. Rubinstein v Collins, 20 F.3D 160, 1990.

        Party in interest may become liable for fraud by mere silence acquiescence and partaking of benefits of fraud. ( Bransom v Standard Hardware, Inc, 874 S.W. 2d 919, 1994).

        Fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments, (U.S. v Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61 ( underline emphasis.)

NEW CURRANCY

 

PENCE ANNOUNCES NO MORE FIAT MONEY united States money NOW GOLD BACKED USN July 25 2017

Vice President Mike Pense today declared the USA, Inc.'s surrender of the old (cabal Rothschild) fiat USD in favor of the new gold backed USN.

Per international treaty and domestic law, the gold backed USN is now considered the lone sovereign currency of the land and may be released globally across tiers of the Asian controlled financial system.

At approximately 4:30 PM Wednesday, July 26th, President Trump is scheduled to affix his signature to a document declaring the restoration of the Republic and the restoration of the gold backed USN.  Upon this, the restoration of our Republic will be deemed complete by the Elders and the release codes for the Global Currency Revaluation are to be entered in Beijing. 

'Obamacare' was to be voted on Tuesday July 25th by the Senate.  The ending vote was a tie - 50/50.  Pence cast the determining vote for the Senate to debate and REPEAL 'Obamacare'.  

As reported, one of the provisions Obama demanded be hidden within 'Obamacare' was that the RV was NOT meant to be a benefit for the American People and the RV was NOT to take place for the benefit of the united States.  Obama saw himself as being the eternal 'king' and 'ruler' of this nation, if not the entire planet, and made provisions within legislation and other means to guarantee slavery and distress upon the American people would continue and even increase.  Obama's NO RV stipulation has been successfully overruled for the benefit of the people of the united States.

That stipulation, among many others yet to be revealed, was one of the primary reasons that Nancy Pelosi, as Speaker of the House, kept insisting that the 'Obamacare' legislation should be 'passed' immediately without time for the customary review, questions and debates. 

Now that Obama is out of office - despite what he may think otherwise - all the poison, rats, traps and treason at his hands is coming up through the cracks, including through DNC whistle blowers.  It is definitely NOW the time for Obama's arrest and prosecution. Obama's 'legacy' is, by far, the worst record for any man in the office of the president of the cabal crime syndicate that ruled and reigned over this nation.  Good riddance - FINALLY.

God bless President Trump, his family, staff and appointees.

God bless America and her people.   

God bless those who have worked selflessly, diligently, faithfully - most without pay - behind the scenes to do what is necessary to take back our country and release her people from the imposed slavery of the birth certificate, the social security numbers and the corporation identification imposed upon us without our approval and knowledge upon our birth.

May this nation repent - each individually and as a nation of people - and turn back to her one true God that He may forgive us and place His hands of protection over us once again. 

Circumcision: What is it?

 

The Covenant of Circumcision

Important is the separation of the soul from the body, the circumcision made without hands that requires the shedding of blood, that is connected to the seed and unveils a woman. Jesus death, burial and resurrection that unveiled the Bride of Christ.

The seal with which the believer is now sealed is not a mark in the flesh, but "that Holy Spirit of promise, whereby he is sealed unto the day of redemption." This is founded upon his everlasting connection with Christ, and his perfect identification with Him, in death and resurrection; as we read, in Colossians, "And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power. In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ; buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him, through the faith of the operation of God who hath raised him from the dead. And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses." This is a most glorious passage, unfolding to us the true idea of what circumcision was meant to typify.

Every member of the household of faith must bear in his body the seal of that covenant. There must be no exception. "He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh, for an everlasting covenant. And the uncircumcised man child, whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people, be hath broken my covenant." We are taught in Romans 4, that circumcision was "a seal of the righteousness of faith." "Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness." Being thus counted righteous, God set His "seal" upon him.

Every believer belongs to "the circumcision" in virtue of his living association with Him who, by His cross, has forever abolished everything that stood in the way of His Church's perfect justification. There was not a speck of sin on the conscience, nor a principle of sin in the nature of His people, for which Christ was not judged on the cross; and they are now looked upon as having died with Christ, lain in the grave with Christ, been raised with Christ, perfectly accepted in Him — their sins, their iniquities, their transgressions, their enmity, their uncircumcision, having been entirely put away by the cross. The sentence of death has been written on the flesh; but the believer is in possession of a new life, in union with His risen Head in glory.

God honors the bent of the heart

 

Do not trifle with conscience, else you may get into a state which can only be compared to hell upon earth. No human power should have induced you to tell a lie, much less to swear one!

It is one thing to see this and another thing to know how to get out of it. It is clearly wrong for a Christian to be yoked with an unbeliever for any object. The fact of your having entered into this partnership in ignorance may account for your entrance, but it cannot justify your continuance therein. You have only to bow down before your Lord and confess your failure and look to Him to deliver you out of your false position.

Do nothing rashly. You must seek to act honorably toward your partner and toward all to whom you owe anything. God honors the bent of the heart and conscience in a right direction, and we must not do wrong things in seeking to get out of a position.

The sooner you get out of it the better. But then care must be taken to do things in a right way. It is certain that no worldly advantage should induce you to remain in a position which robs you of communion with God and His people.

I Corinthians 7:14-17

14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband: else were your children unclean; but now are they holy.

15 But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace.

16 For what knowest thou, O wife, whether thou shalt save thy husband? or how knowest thou, O man, whether thou shalt save thy wife?

17 But as God hath distributed to every man, as the Lord hath called every one, so let him walk.